Date of visit: 19 February 2019
Visit number: 81
Prison type: High Security
The Officers described a safe and calm prison, with ‘excellent’ staff-prisoner relations, and strong support among staff. They appreciated the An informal term referring to a prison’s Governors (or Directors in private jails) visibility, and encouragement and support for staff (including after incidents), regular consultation with staff, and weekly newsletter (which also includes thanks and messages of support). Twice daily wing briefings were valued, as was ‘trauma informed’ training for all staff. The range of specialist units, including Psychologically Informed Planned Environment – a specialist unit run by psychologically trained staff and supervised by psychologists, to support prisoners’ rehabilitation and Personality Disorder units, were rated highly, as were support for families, Scheme bringing together students and prisoners to study together – see also “Inside Out” (with Cambridge Uni), and staff-prisoner ‘rehab culture’ committee.
Managers agreed the jail was safe and calm, with good staff-prisoner relationships. They highlighted individual action plans and specialist units for complex and challenging prisoners, widespread engagement and consultation with prisoners, and support for families. A staff-prisoner Synthetic psychoactive substance, originally marketed as a synthetic cannabis – often used as a generic term for all synthetic psychoactive substances action committee, and scanning of all mail, had reduced New Psychotic Substances like the synthetic cannabis ‘Spice’. They noted a strong family culture across disciplines, and a resilient and dedicated workforce. Staff support was a strength and sick rates were ‘very low’. The Governor was ‘highly visible’, empowered managers and consulted widely with staff, followed up all assaults personally, and regularly praised and thanked staff, including through the weekly newsletter. Open days for staff families were another positive.
Prisoners too rated safety and staff-prisoner relationships. They valued a stable and predictable regime, and opportunities for progression, and highlighted prisoner consultation and engagement, singling out the peer-led induction programme. They described the No. 1 as ‘approachable’, ‘progressive’ and ‘honest’. The library and education, including the involvement of outside speakers and groups (like ‘Learning Together’), were ‘fantastic’. Support for families, including all day family visits, were highlighted, as were the kitchen facilities on every spur.