Date of visit: 4 October 2018
Visit number: 53
Prison type: Category C
MANAGERS & OFFICERS
The managers and Officers said this was a ‘very safe’ prison with good staff-prisoner relations and ‘no issues’ with Synthetic psychoactive substance, originally marketed as a synthetic cannabis – often used as a generic term for all synthetic psychoactive substances. They rated the ‘visible’ management – with the jail toured daily by the Duty Governor and regularly by the An informal term referring to a prison’s Governor (or Director in private jails) – daily briefing for all operational staff, and regular full staff meetings. Being ‘very clean’ and well-maintained (by the garden and small repairs parties) was ‘good for both prisoners and staff’, as was their mutual respect within a ‘strong’ culture of decency and care for prisoners (‘residents’). Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork – multi-disciplinary care planning process for prisoners identified as being at risk of suicide or self-harm were ‘very low’ and support for prisoners at risk of self-harm was ‘excellent’, as was the wide range of prisoner reps and mentors (including for veterans and older prisoners). The ‘active’ Committee of prisoner representatives meeting with senior management to discuss issues relevant to the management and care of prisoners in the jail was ‘very effective’, with members identified by T-shirts. They noted a good range of education, vocational training, and workshops. They liked ‘Jail Jottings’, the weekly staff newsletter, which included ‘thank you’s for jobs well done, and staff recognition with prizes (including gift vouchers and free meals at the highly valued staff bistro). Family members being invited to the prison’s Prison Officer Entry Level Training – generally used to describe Officers under training and recent graduates graduation ceremony was also much appreciated.
The prisoners described a ‘very safe’ jail with ‘very tight’ security (‘a good thing’), little or no drugs, and a ‘very visible’ and approachable No. 1. They praised the thorough 7-day, peer-led prisoner induction, and the wide range of peer mentors (including healthcare champions, trained by healthcare staff), who were linked to, and well supported by, relevant prison managers. The ‘effective’ Prisoner Council, with two reps per wing, regular and fully minuted meetings with senior managers, and strong senior management buy-in, was ‘widely respected’ by prisoners and staff. The food was ‘very good’, and the gym was ‘excellent’: its ‘very’ supportive staff did ‘excellent’ work with prisoners with physical and mental health issues (‘common in this prison’). The Drug and Alcohol Action Team (Drug & Alcohol Treatment) team was also highlighted as doing ‘very good’ work, and education and training opportunities were rated too.